WINNIPEG, Manitoba (AP) - Child welfare workers removed two children from their home in Winnipeg after a seven-year-old girl went to school with hate-related drawings on her body, police said Monday.Those social workers sure knew that not many would feel for allegedly racist parents, thus - there wouldn't be much opposition to their actions. With little or no opposition, people will soon get used to the idea that children could be taken away from the parents whose views are considered politically incorrect. And what's going to happen next? Who is going to be their next victim?
Police Const. Blair Good said the girl and a boy, 2, were removed, but she would not confirm a report that the girl's body had a swastika and a white supremacy slogan written on it. Manitoba Child and Family Services wants permanent guardianship of the children.
We've seen that with the HRCs. At first they came for the lone extremists and for their webmasters. Then they came for a Christian pastor who refused to accept perverse lifestyles as normal, for a nurse whose "crime" was distributing flyers, picturing medical consequences of homosexual lifestyle, they came for a Christian couple who didn't want to allow a perverse orgy in her bed-and-breakfast... Finally, they came for Ezra Levant and Mark Steyn, they came for McLean's and for The Catholic Magazine, they came for the Christian Heritage Party and for its leader - Ron Gray...
...So it would be naive for any parent to consider himself immune from social workers' newfound right to snatch the kids from families whose views they disprove.
In Ontario, and probably the rest of Canada, “children’s aid” legislation makes it clear that they are to operate under the philsophical premise that children belong to the state, not to their parents. Also, the legislation that changed the definition of marriage to allow homosexual “marriage,” also changed the definition of parent from natural parent to legal parent. This means that, in the eyes of the law, people are parents by the authority of the state, not by virtue of biological and natural relationship. If child welfare workers are going to snatch the children of suspected racists today, then what’s stopping them from snatching the children of Christians - or anybody else tomorrow? This is the transition that we’ve seen take place in the “human rights” industry.
4 comments:
In Poker they call that "over the top".
Wonder why they didn't send the girl home for the day and ask the parents to remove the objects of of offense, "hate"?
"Over the top"
They have a real double standard when it comes to what is offensive and defining "hate" to I have noticed.
That school and the teacher should be sued by those parents.Then sue child welfare for discrimination!
This is just the tip of the iceberg, Leonard. I would refer you to a radio show archived here:
http://truthbrigade.org/smf/index.php?topic=1545.0
There are a few other shows on this topic of the CAS in Canada and the CPS in the U.S. Believe me, it is the same on both sides of the border.
The trouble with the CAS is the same as with the CHRC. They are their own authority. They have more impunity than the police to enter and seize children on an anonymous "tip". Their court plays by their rules using the rulebook they provide. They have their own "expert witnesses" and the Judges and Lawyers and Child Advocates are all paid out of the same pocket. They BANKRUPT families who try to oppose them. It is BIG BUSINESS because they receive taxpayer and other funding to remove children from homes and place them in foster care. It is a vicious circle. Parents cannot win against this corrupt system.
Plus you know if someone called in a tip of someone with the hammer and sickle that would be good parenting even though the commies killed more than the national socialists did.
Post a Comment