Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Exposing Their Agenda Is "Discriminatory"

Simon is thirty-three. He is, I suppose, exactly the person that families worry about. He is a primary school teacher, and an active member of several social service agencies that deal with children, including Big Brothers. He has taught for ten years in four different schools and has formed sexual, loving relationships with boys in each of those four schools and in each of the service organizations of which he is a member, including Big Brothers. He has never been caught.

Simon is tall, genial, getting a little soft around the middle; a generous, rather private man with few close adult friends and a much wider acquaintance among the young. His lover, David, is twelve and in Simon's class at school. David writes poetry to Simon
That text could be found on the "Canadian lesbian and gay archives" website among many other articles about what they call "intergenerational" or "boy-loving" relationships. Nobody hides them. A radical homosexual from the University of Calgary "proudly" provides the links to those texts on his website, where he claims that such relationships are acceptable. But when Bill Whatcott photocopies a classified ad that reads "Man seeking boys.... age not so relevant" and distributes those photocopies in his neighborhood - a "human rights" tribunal finds that "discriminatory" and fines him $17,500 for hurting perverts' feelings and self-esteem.

The media will gladly report a child abuse case in which a Catholic is involved. But don't expect them to quote the above mentioned text; don't expect them to give the public any hint that those who don't feel bound by gender often don't feel bound by age. And if someone dares to expose the true agenda of militant homosexuals - through flyers or newspaper articles - there's always a freedom-snatching commission with 100% conviction rate to find that "discriminatory" and to impose heavy fines for doing so.

1 comment:

Neal Ford said...

Harper's majority could be achieved simply by shutting these fascist HRCs down.

Only radicals support them, and I believe, that te apparent public support for so-called "gay rights" is the result of people living in fear of being either hauled in front of one of these commissions, sent to "sensitivity and diversity" training, and/or the end of the line for career advancement, or outright termination of employment.
That is exactly how the Nazis kept such a tight lid on things.
In their case, they issued employment books, which 1) Tied the employee to a job unless the employer authorized their departure, or fired them, and any negative comments toward the regime and its propaganda could result in job loss or loss of promotions.... Try getting hired anywhere else after you're labelled a troublemaker. Same thing applies today in canada, but more subtly.
Get'em by the pocketbook, and you own them.

I believe that people are really angry about the PC culture,a nd would lash out if they were not living in fear of job loss and/or being publicly tarred as a "bigot".