Monday, November 23, 2009

Can There Be A Better Proof That Global Warming Is A Fraud?

Way to go whoever made the envirocrooks' archives public!
Electronic files that were stolen from a prominent climate research center and made public last week provide a rare glimpse into the behind-the-scenes battle to shape the public perception of global warming.

While few U.S. politicians bother to question whether humans are changing the world's climate -- nearly three years ago the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded the evidence was unequivocal -- public debate persists. And the newly disclosed private exchanges among climate scientists at Britain's Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia reveal an intellectual circle that appears to feel very much under attack, and eager to punish its enemies.

In one e-mail, the center's director, Phil Jones, writes Pennsylvania State University's Michael E. Mann and questions whether the work of academics that question the link between human activities and global warming deserve to make it into the prestigious IPCC report, which represents the global consensus view on climate science.

"I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report," Jones writes. "Kevin and I will keep them out somehow -- even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!"
That's what they call as scientific debate. And if someone does publish something the envirofascists don't agree with - they call for a boycott of the dissenting article and of the journal that published it. Anyone else needs to be convinced that global warm-mongering has nothing to do with science or climate research, that it's all about money?
It’s unthinkable. Big Government has spent $79 billion on the climate industry, 3000 times more than Big Oil. Leading climate scientists won’t debate in public and won’t provide their data. What do they hide? When faced with freedom-of-information requests they say they’ve “lost” the original global temperature records. Thousands of scientists are rising in protest against the scare campaign. Meanwhile $126 billion turned over in carbon markets in 2008 and bankers get set to make billions.
There are thousands of e-mail transcripts posted on the Alleged CRU e-mails website. How about each one of us picking one of those e-mails and forwarding it to Stephen Harper, asking him not to attend the Copenhagen gathering of enviro-crooks and earth-worshipers?

No comments: