Let's say you tell a homosexual that you respect his choice. Guess what - that's "homophobic". Because in the eyes of their activists, their lifestyle choice is not a choice but rather a "hereditary predetermination". They were "born this way", get it? Facts prove otherwise? Too bad for the facts.
Evidence from twin studies does in fact support the conclusion that heritable factors play a role in male homosexuality. However, the likelihood that the identical twin of a homosexual male will also be gay is about 20% (compared with 2-4 percent of males in the general population), indicating that sexual orientation is genetically influenced but not hardwired by DNA, and that whatever genes are involved represent predispositions, not predeterminations.There are many other researches which make it clear that so called "sexual orientation" could be changed and the success rate for those who seek help is high. But homosexual activists would dismiss the facts as "homophobic". They'll keep showing a picture of a baby with the label "homosexual" on his hand, claiming that perverse behaviour is something people are born with and therefore - it should be accepted as normal.
Normal? A man who worked closely with these people does not think so:
I don't like the word "gay" used in the context of homosexuality. Like "queer" it is a perfectly useful word which has nothing to do with the real issue raised in a later post: the practice of sodomy. People who take it up the back door tend to die young, from horrible diseases or from complications arising from other aspects of that lifestyle. That they are often very bright, kind-hearted people, and that they leave no copies of themselves, does not make their suffering and untimely deaths less heartbreaking.Medical researches show that homosexuals are responsible for about 2/3 new AIDS infections, that Syphilis is on the rise among homosexual, bisexual men (now they account for about 60% of the new cases), that their life expectancy is significantly lower.
In Denmark, the country with the longest history of "gay marriage", for 1990-2002, married heterosexual men died at a median age of 74yrs., while the 561 partnered gays died at an average age of 51.Homosexual activists have no arguments against any of that. When another blogger, JemDude posted these stats on his blog, he got about two dozen angry comments from mostly anonymous users calling him "homophobic" or "closet homosexual". I checked all the comments - I found no arguments from the pro-homosexual side. Not a single one, because name calling and "I know you are but what am I" can't be considered as such.
In Norway, married heterosexual men died at an average age of 77 and the 31 gays at 52 yrs. In Denmark, married women died at an average age of 78 yrs. compared to 56 yrs. for the 91 lesbians. In Norway, women married to men died at an average age of 81. v. 56 for the 6 lesbians.
Jemdude is a true fighter. He won't give up just because a bunch of perverts calls him names. But there are others, who think the same way but afraid to speak their mind because that may result in being fired or sued for "hate mongering". The word "homophobia" stands for "fear of homosexuals". But the only group that actually makes people fear is the homosexual lobby. Which gives a different definition to the well-abused word:
Homophobia - fear of reprisals from homosexual lobby; lack of courage to speak up against homosexual propaganda at schools, workplaces and government offices; leads to failure to stand up for traditional marriage and family values as well as inability to analyze the facts which clearly prove that homosexual lifestyle choice is neither morally acceptable nor biologically normal.
So if we want May 17th to be the International Day Against Homophobia - I'm ready to support that. Provided we actually fight Homophobia - as defined above, speaking up against the homosexual lobby, rather than trying to silence people who have the courage to oppose massive propaganda of perverse lifestyles.
6 comments:
Thank you for your kind words.
The "blame game" that homosexuals do has no limits. For example, I posted an article on the homosexual subculture that wants to be infected with HIV or AIDS, and a couple of people are blaming Christians for their sick desires to become ill!
http://jemdude.blogspot.com/2007/04/same-sex-subculture-wants-to-be.html
I think it's unwise to come out all guns a-blazing in this fashion. The fact is when you are ministering to 99% of homosexuals, you are ministering to people who deny the God of the Bible. Yelling at them "REPENT! SINNER!" means nothing to them and does nothing to demonstrate for them the love of Christ.
But beyond that, I don't think it is appropriate to says stuff like "They have no arguments against us! I read all the comments and all they did was call us vile things!" I think that is because that is what they perceive you doing. But the fact is I have seen responses to life expectancy statistics, and they are easily dismissed with such statements as, "Most of the reason for such stats is depression and rejection associated with being gay. If only bigots like you didn't exist, and we were free and accepted, we wouldn't be depressed and suicidal." It is impossible to prove, so it has to be rendered moot.
But regardless, I return to my main point. As Christians, as long as we keep ranting and raving about the evils of "queer society" and so on, we are not going to win any gays out of their lifestyle, let alone their souls for Jesus.
Where in my post was I actually ministering to homosexuals? I was denouncing the idea of having a special "day against homophobia" or any other campaign to silence those who oppose perverse lifestyles.
Homosexual activists claim there's nothing wrong with their lifestyle choice; I say: yes, there is. Homosexuality is abnormal, morally wrong and a serious health hazard. It is possible for homosexuals to leave their destructive lifestyle, thus the society should encourage them to do just that, rather than submitting to their activists. To prove my point, I brought some facts against which perverts usually find no arguments except name calling.
I concluded my post by suggesting that if someone calls on us to fight "homophobia", we better interprete this word as fear from homosexual lobby and encourage people to speak up against it. By the way, if people are encoraged to speak up against what the lobby wants them to accept as truth and norm - we will end up winning more people out of their lifestyle than we'd ever do by preaching tolerance without borders.
If someone reads your blog, and reads this post looking for whatever, he is going to read hate. Not because you think it needs to be said that the homosexual lobby overreacts and forbids any questioning of their lifestyle in any way, but because of your consistent use of words such as "perverts" to talk about homosexuals.
Even if no gays come to your site (though if they have found their way to Jemdude's page, surely they could find yours too), what exactly are you teaching other Christians or social conservatives? You are teaching that you will insult and label your opponents, and perhaps others will take a cue from you and do the same.
Tell me - what is loving about that? What fruit of the spirit is that?
Same like there's nothing wrong with calling someone who steals a thief, I don't see anything wrong with calling someone who engages in perverse behavior a pervert. I detest political correctnes and my message to Social Conservative is to do the same. Like it or not, there's no other way to overcome the social engineering instituted by the political left.
I agree with Leonard. It's my experience that no matter how softly you try to address homosexuality, the homosexuals will be angry at you. The only time they will not be angry at you is if you fully agree with their views. So you might as well feel free to "call a spade a spade".
After all, even us Christians don't mind that we were once "dirty rotten sinners" and still do from time to time. But because we have accepted Jesus into our lives, our sins are forgiven. We also do our best to obey God's commandments and to live the lifestyle He wants us to live.
Post a Comment