Still I could imagine that kind of training. First lesson would include general promises - to boost immigration levels, to purge all the white males out of public service jobs, replacing them with ethno-cultural minorities, to legislate ethnic quotas for businesses...
Further lessons would include issues that are specific to certain communities, to ensure that each group gets the right promise - such as appointing judges that would strike down the ban on ceremonial daggers in schools or persuading the provincial governments to keep overlooking all the polygamous unions that have been mushrooming in our major cities...
Yes, those are my assumptions. But there's one thing I can be sure of - none of this "targeting by ethnicity" is going to benefit the ordinary Canadians, those who don't belong to the special interest / designated victim groups. Rather the opposite - all those promises will come at our expense:
The latter must be a rhetorical question. We all know what kind of "inclusion" the Liberal party of Canada stands for.“We are supposed to be a party of openness and inclusion, where all Canadians, regardless of race, religion, and background can feel comfortable and welcome.”LOL, whites, farmers, gun owners, stay at home moms, Orangemen, pro lifers, members of the military, whites, Christians should all feel welcome by LPoC? ha ha ha,….
Males are more likely to be unemployed in Canada than women but Liberals still push hiring quotas, and bans of white males to make us feel included? or when they want to be inclusive are the groups above chopped liver and do not count? Presumably just Post trudeaupian groups are to be included?
No comments:
Post a Comment