By Tim BloedowToday this may look like an ordinary article on 'human rights' commissions. But this was written in May of 1999. When the presumption was - that unless you're a neo-nazi radical - then it would never happen to you; that the censorship those commissions impose was quite 'reasonable', that it could be 'necessary' to protect minorities from abuse and discrimination...
One of the most terrifying aspects of Canadian politics for social conservatives – at least this should be the case – is the nation’s so-called “human rights” commissions and tribunals. These kangaroo courts, where historical, Judaeo-Christian principles of jurisprudence are tossed out the window, have established themselves in almost every part of Canada as the primary tool by which leftists seek to crush dissent in this country.
Those on the front lines are well aware that despite the positive images that ordinary Canadians might have of “human rights,” a vigorous battle is being fought under that banner against traditional values, unborn babies, the natural family and Christianity.
Am I exaggerating? People who have ears to hear will not think so when they find out some of the details about the committee Justice Minister Anne McLellan set up to review the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Fast forward to late 2000s - and here we have people being persecuted for not merely disagreeing with a member of a privileged special interest group (typically - a Muslim or a homosexual radical). Here's the most recent example of what could happen nowadays when you say no to one of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment