"Human Rights" Tribunals Know Who Is A Racist

Remember Jean Chretien's "a proof is a proof and when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven"? Well, "human rights" tribunals need none. If they believe you're a racist - they'll convict you without bothering looking for evidence:

The Toronto Police Service says it is considering applying for a judicial review of a human rights tribunal decision that found one of its officers racially profiled a woman but failed to find any evidence of racist attitudes.

A Nov. 9 ruling from the tribunal found that Sgt. Stephen Ruffino violated the Ontario Human Rights Code when he stopped Sharon Abbott on March 26, 2007.
...
The tribunal found Abbott's own behaviour contributed to the escalation of the incident and noted that Ruffino did not appear to take any steps to defuse the incident.

But the ruling noted there was no evidence Ruffino "consciously subscribes to any such (racist) attitudes or belief systems."

Toronto Police spokesman Mark Pugash said this decision makes any defence against a racial profiling allegation impossible and follows a ruling last summer that Chief Bill Blair described as setting an impossibly high standard for the force to defend against racial bias.

More >>>

Once again, one doesn't have to be a lone radical or a fundamentalist preacher to be targeted by a freedom-snatching commission. The Toronto Police Service wants a judicial review - let's see if that helps to expose the true nature of those Orwellian tribunals to those who still believe that "human rights" commissions actually have something to do with protecting human rights.