Chemical Contraception = "Living Naturally"?

Here's an interesting occurrence, observed by Matthew Archbold from the Creative Minority Report blog:

She's been "living naturally" since New Year's Day. (Her words)

She said she feels so much better ("fantabulous!!!" was her word) and she's been doing a lot of reading about all the "unnatural" chemicals people put in their bodies and how harmful it all is.
...
In the conversation my buddy joked about me "detoxing" my five children.

"What?!" gasped the woman. "Really? You really have five kids?"
...
Then she asked me if I was crazy?

I responded I was. (I mean, how else do you respond to that?)

"My gosh," she said, slowing herself down for a moment. "I couldn't even imagine. One's enough for me. I'm not having anymore. My husband wants more but thank God for the Pill."

Ms. Natural Living is on the Pill?

I couldn't hold me tongue so I just threw it out there. "How does all this natural living coincide with all the chemicals you're putting in your body from the Pill?"

And then she said that she needs to be on the Pill because it allows her to live naturally. If she had more children then she wouldn't have the time to live the way she wanted to live, she said.

More >>>

Yep, that's the way the secularist double-think works: chemical contraception is natural. Having children - is not. Just like there are plenty of people who believe that gender is "socially constructed" but homosexuality is "natural". Or - that seal hunt is cruel but abortion is a "human right".

But thankfully, there are still people who question those secularist dogmas:

What a horrific lie it is, to convince millions upon millions of healthy woman that their bodies' natural fertility is a terrible disease for which a decades-long prescription to a drug engineered to fight against it is not only necessary, but imperative!

(Erin Manning)

Right on!