An Extension Of A "Right To Choose"?

The Ottawa Sun reports:

"A 26-year-old Kanata woman faces a charge of second-degree murder after police allege she gave birth to a baby boy, killed him and put him in the trash.

Police Staff-Sgt. Monique Perras said Angela Kuehl was arrested yesterday morning without incident and charged later that afternoon following a five-month investigation into the death of her newborn."

As the Sun reports in another story, women who kill their newborns are seldom severely punished. As Kirsten Kramar, a sociologist with the University of Winnipeg, told the paper, "Women who commit this crime [infanticide] are not a danger to society. Sending a woman to prison to serve hard time is not a deterrent to other women." So that makes it okay for them to kill their kids? Just consider it an extension of a woman's right to choose.

(Source: Sobering Thoughts)

If poor-choicers believe it's ok to kill unborn babies - why would they oppose killing a newborn? The same arguments abort-mongers use to justify murdering a baby before his first breath (whom the law regards as "unperson") could be used to justify murdering a baby after his first breath. Even if the baby is already considered as person by the Canadian law, we've got plenty of bleading-heart-Liberal judges that twist the law and devalue human life; suggesting by their lean sentencing that baby's personhood is still less worthy than ours, thus it can't prevail over his mother's desire to get rid of him.

Who is going to be next "less-equal Canadian", whose murder won't be a big deal in the eyes of our "progressive" judges, as long as it's done for someone else's convenience? Are you sure you'll never become one of those "persons unworthy of living"?

Justice begins with the unborn!