...So they harass those who refuse to accept their myths as dogmas. In Canada,
they use "human rights" tribunals to get back at those who dare to defend traditional family values. In the US they're trying to get the Supreme Court on board, in an attempt to have their scare tactics enshrined in law:
The Supreme Court is currently in the process of discovering a new Constitutional right — the right to publish the names and home addresses of anyone you disagree with politically, in hopes that they’ll be made to pay a high price for offending you. For once Justices Scalia and Ginsberg seem to be on the same side of an issue: they think this is just another way to exercise free speech. Scalia went so far as to say, “[R]unning a democracy takes a certain amount of civic courage. And the First Amendment does not protect you from criticism or even nasty phone calls when you exercise your political rights to legislate, or to take part in the legislative process.”
The Supreme Court case has to do with “gay” activists wanting to publish the names and addresses of every citizen in the state of Washington who signed a petition for “Protect Marriage Washington.” The idea, of course, is to scare people off signing such petitions. Once it becomes widely known that you’ll receive threatening phone calls, or that your employer will be pressured to fire you if you sign a petition to reserve marriage to one man and one woman, people just might decide not to “take part in the legislative process” after all.
Without scaring the silent majority from supporting pro-family initiatives, how will they be able to force the society into conceding that homosexual behavior is "normal"? How else can they back their claims that gender differences are irrelevant, that two men or two women can actually form a married couple and that their relationship would be socially and biologically equal to a relationship of a unitive and procreative nature between a man and a woman? The science doesn't back any of their claims, that's for sure:
“Gender effects prove to be especially strong in our analysis... The assumption that these gender differences would gradually fade out, or even disappear as gender roles have become less rigidly enforced in Western societies is clearly not confirmed in this analysis of 16-year-olds.”
Yep. These are the kind of researches they conduct. They expect gender differences to "fade out" and then they discover that somehow it doesn't happen, that the X and Y chromosomes still fail to evolve into a gender-neutral chromosome-zero... No wonder homosexualists have a zealous hatred not just for science, but also for those who remind them of basic scientific truths. They know that they can never win an open scientific debate, so they try to win arguments by scaring their opponents into silence.
No comments:
Post a Comment